Arguments against the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU

Dossier / Travail , 2005 , 21 Pages , Note: 2,0

Gestion d'entreprise - Politique économique

Executive Summary

Initiated in 1962, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is a system of agricultural subsidies. These subsidies work by guaranteeing a minimum price to producers, by deficiency payments or by direct income payments. The purpose of this paper is to question this policy by analyzing several impacts. As a result, we come to following main findings: The CAP causes budget troubles and costly disposal problems. Although agriculture is a declining sector that provides only about 4% of European jobs and 2% of European GDP, it is still provided with 46% of the EU budget in 2005. Furthermore, it is financed at the expense of consumers and taxpayers.

The EU export subsidies and the dumping cause worldwide distortions in the agricultural sector. Moreover, CAP policy makers use misleading justifications of their practices. Although the CAP is often promoted as helping small family farms, the largest part of it goes to huge commercial corporations and to some royal families. The distribution is unequal to the degree that 20 % of the farms (i.e. the largest farms) get 80 % of the benefits. The smallest farms (40 % of the total number) share only 8 %. As such, small family farms receive subsidies of quite an insignificant nature.

The CAP has encouraged the industrialization of agriculture, giving rise to factory farming practices and widespread animal suffering. The problem was that industrial farming led to more intensive use of land and chemicals.

Former reforms caused the EU to proceed from price supports to direct income subsidies. Thus, the CAP could be gradually improved, but today there still remain a lot of problems inherent, that allow to question the “raison d’être” of the CAP. [...]

Table of Contents

List of abbreviations

List of figures

1. Introduction

2. The CAP and its impact
2.1. Methods of support
2.2. Budget troubles and “food mountains”
2.3. Dumping - “Everything but EU farms”
2.4. Unequal distribution of benefits
2.5. Environmental damages

3. Reforms

4. Evaluation of today’s CAP
4.1. Instruments of the CAP
4.2. Budget troubles and “food mountains”
4.3. Dumping
4.4. Unequal distribution of benefits
4.5. Environmental damages

Appendix

References

List of Abbreviations

illustration not visible in this excerpt

List of Figures

Figure 1: Price support with tariff

Figure A2: EU budget 2005

Figure A3: Countries shares of total export subsidies (value)

Figure A4: Total global export subsidies

Figure 5: Estimated losses for the poorest countries

Figure A6: Sugar dumping grounds - selected EU export destinations and competitors VI Figure 7: Distributions of gains between big and small farms

1. Introduction

Launched in 1962, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was intended as a common policy in order to strengthen common links in other policy areas. According to Article 33 (former Article 39) of the Rome Treaty^[1] the primary objectives of CAP are to:

a) increase agricultural productivity
b) ensure a fair standard of living for farmers
c) stabilize markets
d) guarantee food supplies
e) ensure reasonable prices for consumers.

Unfortunately these objectives are mutually contradictory and create serious problems. Analyzing the main impacts of the CAP, this paper is organized as follows:

In the beginning of chapter 2 the functioning of the CAP is explained. Afterwards the main problems of this policy are critically analyzed. Here, emphasis is put on financial, social and environmental aspects as well as on world-market distortions. Because of the persisting debate, chapter 3 focuses on the reforms of the CAP. To conclude, chapter 4 briefly evaluates the reformed CAP and indicates prospective challenges.

2. The CAP and its impact

2.1. Methods of support

A substantial element of the CAP is the support of farmers. Here, different methods have been practiced:

a) Variable levies: Threshold prices and charge levies on imports are imposed, which are equal to the difference between world prices and the threshold price. The threshold price marks the minimum price for imported products (El Agraa, 1990, pp. 200). This system may be combined with quotas.
b) Deficiency payments: The EU directly pays the farmers the difference between the market price and a target price for each unit produced (Baldwin/Wyplosz 2004, p. 239).
c) Direct income subsidies: The EU transfers income directly to the farmers independently from their output (Baldwin/Wyplosz 2004, p. 231).

[...]

---

^[1] http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html

• Université: Leuven Catholic University
• Note: 2,0
• Auteur: International Economics M.A. Kenân Özkara (Auteur)
• Année de publication: 2005
• Pages: 21
• N° de catalogue: V53638
• ISBN (ebook): 9783638490344
• ISBN (Livre): 9783656772040
• Langue: anglais
• mots-clé: Arguments, Common, Agricultural, Policy