The aim of the following paper is to take a closer look at Shakespeare’s prose from a stylistic, linguistic and rhetorical point of view. Given the fact that Shakespeare’s prose occurs both in his comedies, tragedies and histories and prose is being used in his plays by characters of different social ranks the question is to be asked which various functions prose as a medium fulfils in relationship to such other functions as setting, dialogue, action and theme. According to Brian Vickers Elizabethan audiences must have been aware of the alternation of prose and verse. It can be assumed that any deviation from the norm which was blank verse was a) felt by attentive audiences and b) had an impact on the way actors behaved on the stage. In the following essay I shall employ the critical method devised by Vickers in his book “The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose”. First, I shall be dealing with different forms of Shakespearean imagery. For the sake of convenience, I am making use of the categories suggested by Vickers. Second, I am trying to find examples showing those recurrent Shakespearean devices which have a determinant influence on what Vickers calls ‘the linguistic structure’. These devices include features like repartee, equivocation, comic logic; malapropism, repetition; foreign and regional English; unusual syntax; fondness for proverbs; word play and punning. Third, I shall prove that Shakespeare made frequent use of various rhetorical figures.
Contents
Introduction
Part one: Various forms of Shakespearean Imagery
1. Thematic Imagery
2. Situational Imagery
3. Atmospheric imagery
4. Subjective Imagery
5. Objective Imagery
6. Forensic Imagery
Part Two: Some Recurrent Linguistic Features in Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language
1. Repartee
2. Equivocation
3. Comic Logic
4. Malapropism
5. Repetition
6. Foreign and Regional English
7. Fondness for Proverbs and Sententiae
8. Wordplay and Punning
a) antanaclasis
b) paronomasia
c) syllepsis
d) asteismus
Part Three: Some Rhetorical Figures in Shakespeare’s Plays
1. anaphora
2. antimetabole (chiasmus)
3. epistrophe
4. gradatio
5. hypallage
6. isocolon
7. parison
8. par omoion
Conclusion
Bibliography
- Quote paper
- Dr. phil. Volker Beckmann (Author), 1983, The Variety of Shakespeare's Prose, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/488835
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X.