By assigning the elementary Planck units to the units of Newton’s Gravitational Constant (G), it resulted that G is actually a function of vacuum (zero point) energy (ZPE) and that it can be therefore manipulated. This paper cites and discusses some possible kinds of Gravity manipulation. ZPE appears to reduce gravity as it is inversely proportional to the gravitational force.
From Coulomb’s Constant, the “Planck charge” (qP) and the corresponding quantum vacuum (QV) lepton/photon ratio are calculated, the latter by dividing qP by the Planck mass. The QV-lepton/photon ratio is very different to the analogous baryon/photon ratio that is predicted by Standard Model, demonstrating that the QV and space-time are two different entities (e.g., that they have a different number of dimensions). A dimensional model for the QV that evolves from, and is supported by, the lepton/photon ratio is presented herein, together with emerging technologies.
By expressing natural constants in terms of Planck units, we found that the Universal Gravitation Constant is the inverse of vacuum density matter-equivalent and the square of Planck time, being the former equal to Planck mass divided by Planck volume. The corresponding new equation of gravitation presented here reveals that gravitation can be manipulated via vacuum energy. Additionally, from Coulomb’s constant, we can derive the “Planck charge” and the corresponding density of virtual vacuum particle pairs. A discussion of the ramifications of these findings is also presented.
PART 1
Gravitation and Inertia as a Consequence of
Quantum Vacuum Energy
von
Dr. Carlos Calvet
Abstract:
By assigning the elementary Planck units to the units of Newton’s Gravitational Constant (G), it resulted in G being a function of vacuum (zero point) energy (ZPE). ZPE appears to reduce gravity, as it is inversely proportional to gravitational force. Further, the value of ZPE density-matter equivalent has resulted to be equivalent to the Planck mass in a Planck volume, rendering a much easier way of calculation.
Key words:
Gravity, Gravitational constant, zero point energy, inertia, electrogravity, quantum vacuum.
Introduction
[...]
Conclusions and Discussion
1. Gravitation as a Combined Force of Mass Attraction and QV Repulsion
Through (5), Newton’s equation of gravitation (1) can be now expressed more precisely (at quantum level) by the following equation:
[...]
2. Gravitational Inertia
Davies [7] and Unruh [8] demonstrated that there exists a real QV-reaction force to accelerated matter, such that mass acceleration and the opposed QV-reaction effect are two forces, which are intimately interrelated in nature, being the corresponding “Davies-Unruh effect” therefore apparently close to the definition of inertia (a reaction force to acceleration). [7] and [8] demonstrated to a wider extent the link existing between masses and QV. Since in the macroscopic world, inertia is the immediate reaction effect opposed to acceleration, the left component of eq. (12) is therefore analogous to inertia as it is the reaction force to mass acceleration. In addition, following the above-mentioned “principle of independency” and treating the left and the right components of eq. (12) independently, gravitation can be redefined as consisting of two components:
[...]
3. Non-Gravitational Inertia
For non-mutually attracting bodies, i.e., for individual accelerated objects, (nongravitational) inertia can be derived from (14), by substituting forces through Newton’s equation of force (F=ma).
[...]
4. Gravity Control through Electromagnetism
Since G has been proven to be a QV-function by (5), the same applies to gravitation through (12), thus providing the realistic possibility of gravity control through manipulation of ZPE. In fact, (12) demonstrates that QV-energy density weakens gravity. In consequence, if we were able to manipulate ZPE, we would be altering gravity through (12). By increasing QVenergy density, gravity would decrease, while by decreasing the QV-energy density, gravity would increase.
Podkletnov [9] discovered in this sense, in a very controversial work, that a “composite bulk YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductor below 70°K under EM field” was able to produce, what he called ‘weak gravitation shielding’, above and below his superconductor arrangement. The experiment was reproduced by Li et al. [10] and others, and explained by this team, Modanese [11], and others. According to [10], “rotating superconductors in an alternating magnetic field would generate gravity”. NASA is studying this effect in its High Temperature Superconductor (HTSC) Research Program, with an aim towards developing technologies for future interstellar navigation.
According to (12), gravity weakens if ZPE increases. Therefore, to produce a ‘gravity shielding effect’, the above arrangement should have been able to increase local ZPE density. This could obviously have happened through the involved magnetic fields (superconductor, coils). In order for a magnetic field to be able to increase ZPE, it is necessary that a transfer of photons from the magnetic fields to the ZPF, takes place. If this happened, then the higher concentration of vacuum radiation (photons) around the arrangement would produce a higher radiation pressure on nearby objects, thus lowering their weight as predicted by (12), what was effectively observed by Podkletnov.
[....]
- Quote paper
- Dr. Carlos Calvet (Author), 2003, Gravity Manipulation and its Binary Nature, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/39804
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X.