The purpose of this scholarly project is to examine the effects of motivational interviewing (MI), on T2DM patient adherence to A1c testing.
The overarching research question for this scholarly project is as follows: In adult patients (18 years and older) with T2DM located in a southern Mississippi outpatient setting, what are the effects (if any) of motivational interviewing on patients’ adherence to recommended A1c testing?
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is worldwide epidemic and is the leading cause of poor health, physical disabilities and premature death. Globally, 422 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2014, and over 1.5 million people died from diabetes-related complications (World Health Organization, 2016). In the United States (U.S.), diabetes was the cause of over 74.9 thousand deaths and 1.85 million disability years lived in 2013. The widespread presence rate of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the U.S. is estimated to reach 44 million by 2034. Presently, nearly 25.8 million adults and children have diabetes, with T2DM being more prevalent in Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, other Pacific Islanders and Native Hawaiians (World Health Organization, 2016).
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Theory of Prevention as Intervention and Neuman’s Systems Model
Author
Purpose
Relevant Major Assumptions
Major Concepts
Theoretical Framework: The Adherence-to-Awareness Model
Rationale for Selecting the Theory of Prevention as Intervention and NSM
Rationale for Selecting the Adherence-to-Awareness Model
References
A rural Primary Care Provider Adherence to the ADA Guideline for Frequency of A1c Testing.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is worldwide epidemic and is the leading cause of poor health, physical disabilities and premature death. Globally, 422 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2014, and over 1.5 million people died from diabetes-related complications (World Health Organization, 2016). In the United States (U.S.), diabetes was the cause of over 74.9 thousand deaths and 1.85 million disability years lived in 2013. The widespread presence rate of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the U.S. is estimated to reach 44 million by 2034. Presently, nearly 25.8 million adults and children have diabetes, with T2DM being more prevalent in Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, other Pacific Islanders and Native Hawaiians (World Health Organization, 2016).
Purpose
The purpose of this scholarly project is to examine the effects of motivational interviewing (MI), on T2DM patient adherence to A1c testing.
PICO
The overarching research question for this scholarly project is as follows: In adult patients (18 years and older) with T2DM located in a southern Mississippi outpatient setting, what are the effects (if any) of motivational interviewing on patients’ adherence to recommended A1c testing?
Middle Range Theory and EBP Model
Theory of Prevention as Intervention and Neuman’s Systems Model
The Neuman’s Systems Model presents a wide-ranging holistic and system-centered approach that is made up of flexibility elements. The primary focus on the model is based on patient’s response to potential or actual environmental stressors. It utilizes the primary, secondary and tertiary nursing prevention interventions, which seek to retain, attain or maintain the wellness of the patient’s system wellness (Gigliotti, 2012). Thus, the theory of Prevention as Intervention is one of the major middle-range theories derived the Neuman’s System Model (NSM) of nursing.
Author
The NSM model was first coined by Betty Neuman and subsequently introduced in nursing practice and education in 1970s. Betty Neuman was born in Lowel, Ohio in 1924 and obtained her first Bachelor of Science in Nursing in 1957. In 1966, Neuman received her master’s degree in Mental Health Public Health Consultation in 1966 from UCLA. In addition, Betty Neuman attained her doctoral degree in Clinical Psychology in 1985, from pacific Western University. It is during this period that she started working towards incorporating nursing practice in mental health (Neuman, 2002).
Consequently, the Neuman’s System Model was first published in 1972 as “A Model for Teaching Total Person Approach to Patient Problems in Nursing Research. The primary aim of the first publication was to facilitate the formulation of nursing education program that would allow the students to understand nursing problems, from a detailed perspective. NSM was then published in Conceptual Models for Nursing Practice as a first edition in 1974 and the second edition in 1980 (Fawcett & Desanto-Madeya, 2013).
As previously mentioned, the theory of prevention as intervention is derived from NSM; hence the authorship is widely credited to Betty Neuman. As a result, the theory flows and is structurally consistent with the Neuman’s System Model. The theory proposes that the patient’s system is the primary objective for nursing is to improve the optimal stability of the client by preventing or intervening to give support (Neuman, 1989). Prevention as intervention is defined as the process utilized by nurses to provide appropriate care so as to achieve the objective of the stability of the patient. Therefore, intervention can start at any stage or point, when the stressor is suspected or isolated (Fawcett & Desanto-Madeya, 2013).
Purpose
The holistic goal of nursing, as defined by the NSM, is to improve the optimal stability of patient’s system by preventing stress of intervening to provide required support. Similarly, the purpose of the theory of prevention as intervention is to avert any form of diseases or problems prior to medical involvement. Prevention as intervention can be achieved through three levels, in efforts to restore the patient’s stability, in the absence of stressors (Neuman, 2002).
Relevant Major Assumptions
- Each patient has a unique system that is characterized with complex factors and attributed within a range of responses limited in a basic structure.
- There are numerous stressors that are universal, and each stressor may have different implications on the normal stability of the patient.
- Each client has developed a normal range of reactions to the environment known as the normal line of defense. The normal line of defense can be used as a standard in measuring health deviation of a patient.
- The specific inter-relationship of client variables can at any given period, interfere with the extent to which the patient is protected by the flexible line of defense against potential stress reactions.
- When the flexible line of defense fails to protect the patient’s system against the environmental stressors, they break through the line of defense.
- The patient is a dynamic compound of the inter-relationships of the variables, regardless of the state of a disease or wellness. Thus, wellness is often in a continuum of available energy to sustain the patient’s system to achieve desired stability.
- Patients have hidden internal resistance elements, also known as line of resistance. The line of resistance plays a central role in stabilizing and realigning the patient to restore the usual state of wellness.
- The primary prevention is utilized in patient assessment and intervention, in isolation and reduction of potential or specific risk factors.
- The secondary prevention is often concerned with the symptomatology after a reaction to environmental stressors, suitable ranking of intervention main concerns along with treatment plans aimed at reducing their harmful impacts.
- Tertiary prevention intervention is concerned to transformational process taking place as reconstruction process takes starts, and the repairing factors move them back in a cycle that leads to primary intervention.
- The patient is in dynamic and continuous energy exchange with the surroundings
Major Concepts
According to Neuman, the variables of the client in interaction with the external and internal surroundings make up the system of a person. The NSM has four major variables of the patient are psychological, developmental, spiritual, social-cultural and physiological. The theory also highlights different concepts, including the degree of reaction, wellness, stressors, open system, basic structure as well as the intervention (Neuman, 1974). Prevention as a nursing intervention focuses on ensuring that the stressors and the reactions as a result of external and internal environmental factors do not have adverse effects on the system balance of a person. An individual is normally viewed as an open system that communicates with internal and external stressors. A person is exposed to constant and steady changes towards a vibrant state of system permanence or towards disease of various grades (Moss et al. 2002). The environment is a paramount field that is connected to the system and its purpose.
Neuman’s theory has two perspectives, the one that affects and is affected by the system. The internal environment is found inside the system of a person. It accounts for factors that influence the system of the client within the boundaries. The external environment is based or found outside the client’s system. Neuman defines health as the degree of system’s stability and it ranges from wellness to sickness. When the optimum needs of the system are met, then optimal wellness is achieved, while the absence or failure to meet the needs of the system, then the illness is observed. Subsequently, the death of a system (client) is occurs when the energy required to sustain life is not availed on time (Mazroui et al. 2009). As a result, the primary of nursing is to establish the appropriate interventions when the patient’s system is not balanced as a result of either internal or external stressors (Neuman, 1989).
Nursing interventions are mainly based at supporting the system so as to allow it adjust, maintain, restore or take any direction to achieve stability of various variables and internal or external stressors, with a primary aim of conserving the energy. An open system is defined as an uninterrupted flow of input and process, output and response (Parker & Smith, 2012). The flexible line of defense is a protective mechanism which surrounds and protects the normal line from invasion from stressors. Normal line of defense, on the other hand, tends to develop with time and considered normal for a certain system. It also becomes standard for wellness-deviance determination (Mazroui, 2009). The lines of resistance are protection factors that are activated when stressors have bypassed the normal line of defense, resulting to reactionary or precautionary measures. Routinely, prevention as an intervention strategy is utilized when internal or external stressors have not infiltrated the standard line of defense (Neuman, 1974).
Theoretical Framework: The Adherence-to-Awareness Model
Pathman et al. (1996) first utilized non-adherence to national principles for childhood immunizations as a model to formulate a conceptual framework to deal with non-adherence to recommended guidelines. In the adherence-to-awareness model, Pathman et al. described the sequential, cognitive along with behavioral phases required to accomplish physician observance to guidelines as awareness, adoption and adherence. With regards to awareness, physicians are compelled to understand the existence of the guidelines, making the dissemination process of the guidelines very fundamental. Agreement requires health practitioners to agree with the accuracy and dependability of the provided guidelines. Failure to agree with the recommended guidelines leads to the freezing of the treatment process.
Even though physicians may be pressured to adopt the guidelines as a result of peer pressure and possible malpractice litigations, Pathman speculates that most physicians develop the tendency of using guidelines in their treatment plans because they are aware of it and agree with the importance of using the recommended standards in promoting and maintaining patients’ wellbeing. Pathmam et al. further appreciates that adoption and adherence are rampant in evidence-based practice, particularly because of the increases scrutiny from the health regulatory organizations and insurance providers. However, Pathman et al. proposes that physicians are engaged in voluntary compliance of the appropriate guidelines in the provision of care, mainly because they are aware the importance of such conduct in the health care practice.
The adherence-to-awareness model was further developed by Cabana et al. (1999), improving its scope to produce multi-directional flow which emulates the cognitive conflict that lead to barriers manifested as physician non-adherence to required standards. Specific concepts expanded by Cabana et al. (1999) includes lack of knowledge such as lack of awareness and familiarity; attitudes regarding appropriate standards such as lack of agreement, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy as well as inertia of traditional practice; while the final notion is the behavior which is characterized by external barriers.
Rationale for Selecting the Theory of Prevention as Intervention and NSM
The NSM provided framework to guide this DNP project in improving the quality of life and the outcomes of therapeutic interventions among diabetic clients. In the study, the client was an individual diagnosed with type-2 diabetes. Since all the clients have diabetes, they had passed the asymptomatic stage that requires primary intervention and required either secondary or tertiary prevention (Mazroui, 2009). Therefore, the environmental stressors and the internal phathophysiology extra-personal and intrapersonal stress factors had passed through the normal lines of defense and perhaps the flexible lines of defense. The variations are brought about by differences in severity of signs and symptoms and the state of the diseases. This DNP study proposes the utilization of the NSM and the theory of prevention to discover appropriate strategies along with programs that have the capacity to improve the control or management of stressors related t diabetes.
Typically, the conceptual framework as presented by the NSM and the theory of prevention as intervention seeks to strengthen the line of resistance and lessen the effects of diabetic stressors on the client. Using the NSM and the theory of prevention as intervention, the health practitioners can act or take appropriate measures to protect patients suffering from T2DM from negative effects of diabetic stressors. The normal and flexible lines of defenses can also be strengthened to protect the patients from developing complication associated with diabetes as a result of environmental stressors. Malijanian et al. (2002) utilized the NSM conceptual framework to complete their studies on how to improve the diabetes management through provider-based disease management program.
Rationale for Selecting the Adherence-to-Awareness Model
Whereas type 2 diabetes cannot be cured, there are several ways in which the complications can be managed to improve the quality of life and prevent the development of various diseases. Besides, type-2 diabetes can be prevented by adopting effective lifestyles. Consequently, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) has developed therapeutic tool that provides appropriate standards to facilitate the management of T2DM. In other words, ADA provides standard procedures that ought to be followed when handling diabetic patients. Regrettably, studies conducted via the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey illustrates only 27% patients diagnosed with complication resulting from T2DM are directed to take A1c testing (Neumiller et al. 2010)
[...]
- Quote paper
- Leonard Kahungu (Author), 2017, A rural Primary Care Provider Adherence to the ADA Guideline for Frequency of A1c Testing, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/368352
-
-
-
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X.