This paper discusses and contrasts the positions for and against the use of animals for the advancement of science. Moreover, the paper questions how right the use of animals is and whether we should be bothered by their sentiency.
The issue of animal rights begins with the question of what sort of beings are deserving of moral regard. Do we only treat human beings or include animals as well? It also begs the question, how are we supposed to treat animals? Do they have moral rights? When animals suffer, can we equate it to human suffering? Should we ban both experimentation on animals and large scale commercial farming of animal? What is the moral status of animals? Do we have a moral obligation to become vegetarians instead of eating animals?
Peter Singer in 1975 wrote a book Animal Liberation which launched the animal rights movement. It was and is a call for an end to human tyranny towards animals. It was a call to end the pain and suffering of animals. In fact, Peter Singer likened the tyranny on animals with that of white humans over black humans. Peter Singer position today is classified as utilization following on Jeremy Bentham’s agreement for sentiency as the bar we should use to measure morality as opposed to reason. The argument runs as follows. Since all sentient beings have the ability to suffer, it follows that they have interests. And since they have interests, when these are frustrated, it leads to suffering. Being a utilitarian, Singer’s position is one that seeks to maximize satisfaction of interests whether they are of humans or animals. What about Tom Regan’s position?
Tom Regan on the other hand adopts a deontological rights position which is the view that animals, like men are “ends in themselves” and therefore ought not to be exploited. Animals and humans have equal rights. In fact, to Regan, animals have similar essential properties like humans with regards to desires, memories, and intelligence and so on and this therefore gives them equal intrinsic value like humans. Regan is more radical than Singer. Why? He calls for the total end to commercial animal farming, all hunting and trapping of animals, all animals’ experimentation even eating of animals. This article discusses and contrasts the positions taken by these eminent scholars.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- INTRODUCTION
- Tom Regan's Position
- Peter Singer's Position
- The Rights View
- Peter Singer's Views On Animal Rights
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This text examines the positions of Tom Regan and Peter Singer on animal rights. It analyzes their arguments for extending moral consideration to animals and explores the implications of their views for our treatment of animals.
- Moral Status of Animals
- Rights-Based vs. Utilitarian Perspectives
- Animal Suffering and Exploitation
- Speciesism and Equality
- The Abolition of Commercial Animal Agriculture
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- INTRODUCTION: This chapter introduces the central question of animal rights: whether animals deserve moral regard and how we should treat them. It highlights the arguments for animal rights and the need to consider the suffering of animals.
- Tom Regan's Position: This chapter explores Tom Regan's deontological rights position, which argues that animals, like humans, have inherent value and should not be exploited. Regan calls for the total abolition of commercial animal farming, hunting, trapping, and animal experimentation.
- Peter Singer's Position: This chapter examines Peter Singer's utilitarian approach to animal rights. Singer argues that sentience, the capacity to suffer, is the basis for moral consideration and that we should strive to maximize the satisfaction of interests for both humans and animals.
- The Rights View: This chapter elaborates on Regan's rights view, arguing that individuals have intrinsic value independent of their usefulness to others. It emphasizes that animals have inherent value and sanctity of life that should not be violated.
- Peter Singer's Views On Animal Rights: This chapter further explores Singer's views on animal rights, highlighting his argument against speciesism and his call for an expansion of moral horizons to include animals.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Animal rights, moral status, sentience, inherent value, speciesism, utilitarianism, deontology, animal liberation, commercial animal agriculture, exploitation, suffering, equality.
- Citar trabajo
- Mbogo Wa Wambui (Autor), 2013, The Difference in Tom Regan's and Peter Singer's Positon on Animal Rights, Múnich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/322853
-
-
-
-
¡Carge sus propios textos! Gane dinero y un iPhone X. -
-
¡Carge sus propios textos! Gane dinero y un iPhone X. -
-
¡Carge sus propios textos! Gane dinero y un iPhone X. -
-
¡Carge sus propios textos! Gane dinero y un iPhone X. -
-
¡Carge sus propios textos! Gane dinero y un iPhone X.