Introduction to Didascalic Semiotics

A Treatise on Irreversible Logic

Travail de Recherche , 2013 , 56 Pages , Note: 67

Science de Langue / Linguistique (interdisciplinaire)

By the virtue of an experimental non-fictive interjection in didascalia, basically as a meta-textual liberation from narrative Drama (scripts read rather than performed) and which is in due to be tackled in this essay on a verge of criticism; rhetorical inference, that which is intrinsic within the ideal scarcity of dialogical perlocutionary acts (since stage directions are mostly descriptive) could be claimed - under formal theoretical parameters - to propose one of independent chronologies or otherwise a differed diegetic timing against the original immediacy of authorship, if we could estrange the absent author from ontological audience. In other words, if didascalia are mostly known as to be structurally reflexive in correspondence to the linearity of time and actions (fictitious variables) whether to performers on stage, or to readers off-stage-through a medium coder of signifiers (author) would the authorial upmost reference retain the same mode of diegetic liberation when dualized; according to which signature (before dialogue and thus before reference) and omniscience (off dialogue and hence unreliable) manifest a ‘space’ of didascalic autology*?

On the alert of a transitional stage-direction thus from the fiction of narrative didascalia to a non-fiction of its meta-textuality, discrepancies appertaining the metaphoricity of its dialogical rhetoric are due to be rehearsed in between semiotic topographies, after which the non-dialogic rhetoric could be timed. Since the meta-textual metaphorical recognition of
dramatis personae in modern drama is seemingly subjective to the omniscient rhetorical method of narration by virtue of unreliable representational comparability of signifiers (between what readers polarize by the prelocutionary force of dramatis personae against the descriptive extended allegory of the author) a syntactic “identity” seems to have been historically repressed; which, though it could be recognized as a conceptual metaphor - referring to the understanding of one idea, or as a conceptual domain, in terms of another - it proposes most fundamentally a chronological shift of signs different from those in a given text. Such chronology does seem to lurk between the diegesis of inference and the mimesis of reference that all together await a centripetal duality of rhetorical augmentation in didascalia itself (away from a given performance) that permits a meta-textual liberation of lexical heterodiegtic directions.

Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)

• Introduction
• Disassembling of Narrative Method
• Introduction to Dual Omniscience
• Towards Didascalic Chronology (Imminence)
• Non-Alignment of Narrative Didascalia
  • Proof of Crisis in Narrative Diegesis; when Generic Omniscience Multiplies
• The Ir-referentiality of Dual Omniscience
• Imminence Definitions from Experimentations
  • First-Rhetoric and Didascalic Truth
  • Dramatic Truth Contra Dramatic Fact
• Parameters of Imminence
  • Imminence of omniscience (I.O)
  • The Sixth Wall
  • From Imminent Irrelevance to Imminent Salience
  • Statistic-Signal
• The Royal Chronology to Didascalic-Audience
• Reading Force Or Narrative Inertia?
• Didascalic Audience
• Suggestion of an Un-Liberated Didascalic Energy
• Works Cited

Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)

This treatise aims to explore the concept of didascalic semiotics, a unique approach to analyzing the role of stage directions in dramatic texts. It delves into the inherent logic of stage directions, their relationship to narrative structure, and their potential for creating a distinct chronology of omniscience. The text examines the interplay between narrative and meta-textual elements, highlighting the unique characteristics of didascalia as a form of non-fictive interjection.

• The nature of didascalic semiotics and its departure from traditional narrative methods
• The concept of dual omniscience and its implications for understanding stage directions
• The chronological shift from fictive semiotics to didascalic semiotics
• The role of imminence in didascalic chronology and its relationship to narrative inertia
• The impact of didascalic semiotics on the understanding of dramatic truth and dramatic fact

Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)

The introduction lays the groundwork for the treatise by introducing the concept of didascalic semiotics and its potential for liberating stage directions from the constraints of narrative drama. It explores the inherent tension between the authorial voice and the diegetic world of the play, suggesting that stage directions possess a unique chronological and rhetorical dimension.

Chapter 2 delves into the process of disassembling narrative method, examining how stage directions can be understood as a distinct form of semiotics. It explores the limitations of traditional narrative methods in capturing the full potential of stage directions, highlighting the need for a new approach that acknowledges their meta-textual nature.

Chapter 3 introduces the concept of dual omniscience, arguing that stage directions operate on a different level of knowledge than the dialogue within a play. It explores the implications of this dual omniscience for understanding the relationship between author, reader, and performer.

Chapter 4 examines the concept of didascalic chronology, exploring how stage directions can create a distinct temporal framework that differs from the linear progression of the narrative. It explores the notion of imminence as a key element in understanding the unique temporality of stage directions.

Chapter 5 delves into the non-alignment of narrative didascalia, exploring the ways in which stage directions can disrupt the flow of the narrative and create a sense of disjunction. It examines the implications of this disjunction for understanding the relationship between narrative and meta-textual elements.

Chapter 6 explores the ir-referentiality of dual omniscience, arguing that stage directions are not simply a reflection of the narrative world but rather a distinct form of discourse with its own unique logic. It examines the implications of this ir-referentiality for understanding the relationship between author, reader, and performer.

Chapter 7 delves into the concept of imminence, exploring its various definitions and manifestations within the context of didascalic semiotics. It examines the relationship between imminence and the concepts of dramatic truth and dramatic fact, highlighting the unique ways in which stage directions can shape our understanding of the play's world.

Chapter 8 examines the parameters of imminence, exploring its various dimensions and implications for understanding the role of stage directions in creating meaning. It explores the concepts of imminence of omniscience, the sixth wall, and the transition from imminent irrelevance to imminent salience.

Chapter 9 explores the relationship between the royal chronology and the didascalic audience, examining how stage directions can create a unique temporal framework that shapes the audience's experience of the play. It explores the implications of this unique chronology for understanding the relationship between author, reader, and performer.

Chapter 10 examines the tension between reading force and narrative inertia, exploring how stage directions can both propel the narrative forward and create a sense of stasis. It explores the implications of this tension for understanding the relationship between narrative and meta-textual elements.

Chapter 11 explores the concept of the didascalic audience, examining how stage directions can create a unique relationship between the reader and the play's world. It explores the implications of this unique relationship for understanding the role of stage directions in shaping the audience's experience.

Chapter 12 explores the suggestion of an un-liberated didascalic energy, examining the potential for stage directions to create a sense of dynamism and vitality within the play's world. It explores the implications of this un-liberated energy for understanding the relationship between narrative and meta-textual elements.

Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)

The key terms and focus themes of the text include didascalic semiotics, dual omniscience, imminence, narrative method, stage directions, dramatic truth, dramatic fact, narrative inertia, and the didascalic audience. The text explores the unique characteristics of stage directions as a form of non-fictive interjection, examining their relationship to narrative structure, chronology, and the creation of meaning. It delves into the interplay between narrative and meta-textual elements, highlighting the potential for stage directions to create a distinct and dynamic experience for the reader.

• Université: University of Salford
• Note: 67
• Auteur: Yehia Abd El Azeem (Auteur)
• Année de publication: 2013
• Pages: 56
• N° de catalogue: V282046
• ISBN (ebook): 9783656817932
• ISBN (Livre): 9783656817925
• Langue: anglais
• mots-clé: introduction, didascalic, semiotics, treatise, irreversible, logic