Code- switching (CS) is a worldwide phenomenon and has been the norm in many different
communities, but it was unnoticed and neglected by researchers for years. However, due to
social changes, such as globalization and immigration, CS has surfaced in new places and
thereby attracted attention. Nevertheless, those linguistics who researched into the
occurrences of CS mostly commented on it negatively and categorized it as a form of
interference and broken language. The perception of CS changed when Blom and Gumperz in
1972 focused on CS between dialects in a Norwegian fishing village and pointed at its social
dimension and function. As a result, further studies of CS in various parts of the world were
introduced and up until today it is a major research topic. Especially, the motivations for CS
remain an interesting focus for those studies. Moreover, globalization and with this, the
formation of multi-ethnical societies with a variety of different languages in a country is an
on-going process and hence a late- breaking topic. Different sociolinguistic theories to explain
this phenomenon have been developed. Two well-known approaches are Giles’s Speech
Accommodation Theory, nowadays revised as Communication Accommodation Theory
(CAT) and Myers- Scotton’s Markedness Model (MM). The first has its basis in psychology
as it explains CS as a form of accommodation to converge to the addressee in order to become
more alike and therefore narrow social distance. In contrast, the socio-psychological MM also
takes macro-level perspectives into consideration and provides a generalization about how
motivations for CS are interpreted. In this paper I will focus on CS in multilingual societies
and examine, whether this process is only a matter of convergence as CAT claims. Further, I
will match this theory with the MM as it is the leading model in terms of CS in multilingual
communities.
First, I am going to explain the basic theory of both approaches. After the establishment of a
profound theoretical basis, I will introduce a study by Burt, who re-examined CAT’s claim
that every code- switch is motivated by convergence, respectively divergence. By this, the
theoretical approaches will be put into practice and further examples from a multilingual
family will be offered and closely analysed in terms of the motivations for the code- switches.
Finally, an evaluation of the given analyses completes the paper and answers the question of the title.
Content
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical foundations
2.1.Code- switching versus Borrowing and Mixing
2.2. Multilingual communities
3. Social functions of Code Switching
3.1. The Markedness Model by Myers-Scotton
3.2. Communication Accommodation Theory
4. CAT and MM put into practice
5. Evaluation
6. Conclusion
7. Bibliography
-
-
-
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X. -
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X. -
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X. -
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X. -
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X. -
-
Téléchargez vos propres textes! Gagnez de l'argent et un iPhone X.