This thesis analyzes 50 central texts from the five neoconservative writers Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle and Norman Podhoretz to portrait their contributions to the public debate about foreign policy after the Cold War. At the heart of the analysis lies the preemptive strike launched on Iraq in March 2003 and its aftermath. All of the authors under research have openly advocated this decision prior to the invasion, one main question for this thesis is therefore how they assessed the actual implementation of the strategy and its consequences. The central Chapter 2 on the assessment of Iraq seeks to answer what they have learned from Iraq. Before I can answer this adequately, it is necessary to analyze their writings prior to 9/11 and then between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq. I will do this in Chapter 1 and thereby answer the question, what broader lessons the authors have learned from history. Knowing the answer is necessary to understand why they proposed a preemptive strike on Iraq and what their intentions were. Chapter 3 then seeks to connect these insights from Chapter 1 and 2 to shed light on the overall lessons that the authors have learned from their experiences since the end of the Cold War and 8 years of foreign policy under president George W. Bush. As a result, we will have an imperfect yet comprehen-sive overview of neoconservative thinking on American foreign policy since the end of the Cold War.
There is a host of literature on different aspects of the Iraq war that also frequently raise the question to what extent decisions in the administration were actively influenced or taken by neocon-servatives . However, I could not find an analysis of neoconservative texts before and after Iraq. I therefore claim that there is a mismatch between the acclaimed influence of neoconservativism and the extent to which neoconservative writers’ assessment of the Iraq war has been analyzed. In this thesis, I intend to fill this gap with extensive study of original sources instead of secondary literature.
Table of Contents
Introduction
1. The neoconservative agenda: From the 1990’s through 9/11 to Iraq
1.1. Genesis and components of contemporary neoconservative foreign policy
1.2. From 9/11 to Iraq
2. Assessment of Iraq
2.1 Situation on the ground
2.1.1. Occupying Iraq from 2003 to 2005: Success and praise vs. problems and criticism
2.1.2. Civil War 2006 and after: From optimism to disappointment
2.1.3. “The Surge” 2007 and after: From criticism to support
2.1.4. Was it right to invade Iraq?
2.2. The question of responsibility
2.2.1. Kagan, Kristol and Perle: “It’s the administration”
2.2.2. Krauthammer and Podhoretz: “It’s the others”
3. Implications for neoconservative foreign policy
3.1. Perle and Podhoretz “retire”
3.2. Kagan and Krauthammer: Neoconservatism 2.0?
Conclusion
Bibliography
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the central theme of this thesis on neoconservatism?
The thesis analyzes the contributions of five key neoconservative writers to the foreign policy debate after the Cold War, specifically focusing on the Iraq War.
Which authors are studied in this analysis?
The research focuses on Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle, and Norman Podhoretz.
How did neoconservatives view the 2003 invasion of Iraq?
All studied authors advocated for the preemptive strike prior to the invasion, though their assessments of its implementation and consequences varied over time.
What is "The Surge" of 2007 in this context?
It refers to the increase in US troops in Iraq, which neoconservative writers shifted from criticizing to supporting as the situation on the ground evolved.
Who did neoconservatives blame for the problems in Iraq?
There was a split: Kagan, Kristol, and Perle blamed the Bush administration's management, while Krauthammer and Podhoretz tended to blame external factors or "the others."
What is "Neoconservatism 2.0"?
It represents the evolution of neoconservative thinking by authors like Kagan and Krauthammer following the experiences of the Iraq War and the Bush presidency.
- Citation du texte
- Hannes Schweikardt (Auteur), 2014, The Implications of Power. What Contemporary Neoconservatives Learned from History, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/270704
