Celebrity cases, often thrust into the public spotlight, ignite a complex interplay between legal intricacies, heightened public interest, and societal discourse. This Article delves into the multifaceted impact of such cases, employing a legal analysis framework. It examines both the potential benefits, such as raising awareness of critical legal issues and deterring criminal activity, and the drawbacks, including media sensationalism, concerns about unequal treatment, and privacy violations. By exploring real-world case studies, such as the O.J. Simpson trial and the Bill Cosby sexual assault cases, this Article analyzes the legal implications and broader societal impact of these high-profile events. Additionally, it highlights the emerging challenges posed by the digital age, including the influence of social media and the need for harmonized international legal approaches. This Article concludes by emphasizing the crucial role of upholding a fair and impartial legal system, ensuring responsible media coverage, fostering critical thinking, and engaging in continuous dialogue. It underscores the necessity for evolving legal frameworks to address the unique challenges presented by celebrity cases in the digital age. Ultimately, this Article emphasizes the potential for celebrity cases to serve as catalysts for positive societal change and a more equitable legal system through continued collaboration, responsible media practices, and a commitment to justice.

Leseprobe

From Sensationalism to Reform: A Critical Analysis of Celebrity Cases and their Influence on the Legal System

Abstract

Introduction

Individuals propelled into the public spotlight, whether through their contributions to entertainment, sports, politics, or business, face constant public scrutiny that permeates various aspects of their lives (Bartollas, C., & DeKeseredy, V., 2013). When their actions breach legal boundaries, they become embroiled in the intricacies of the legal system, creating a unique and intricate interplay between the complexities of the law and heightened public interest. These "Celebrity Cases" transcend the confines of courtrooms, captivating the public imagination and sparking critical societal discourse on fundamental legal principles (Turner, G., 2004). This discourse extends to the role of the media in shaping public perception and the inherent challenges in achieving just outcomes amidst intense public scrutiny (Johnson, T. J., 2005).

This Article delves into the multifaceted impact of celebrity cases on the legal system, employing a legal analysis framework. Through this framework, we will examine the influence of these cases by utilizing real-world case studies, for instance, the United States v. O.J. Simpson trial, which raised significant legal questions regarding double jeopardy and media coverage in criminal trials (Turner, C. E., & Rachlinski, J. J., 2016). Additionally, the article will explore potential solutions to navigate the inherent challenges presented at this unique intersection, such as balancing the right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, as addressed in the case of Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (American Bar Association, 2023).

By employing an approach that explores both the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with celebrity cases, this Article seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of their intricate interaction with the legal system and their broader societal implications. This analysis recognizes that the ramifications of celebrity cases extend beyond the individual involved, encompassing concerns regarding privacy violations and the potential for unequal treatment within the legal system (Jewkes, Y., 2011). Furthermore, the Article acknowledges the crucial role of examining the media's influence and the potential for sensationalism and biased reporting to distort facts, undermine the presumption of innocence, and hinder the pursuit of justice, as explored in the case of Siegel v. LePera (Associated Press, 2016).

Drawing upon a diverse range of academic sources, legal case studies, and scholarly articles, this research aims to contribute to a nuanced and informed dialogue surrounding celebrity cases and their impact on the legal system and broader societal landscape. By weaving together these diverse perspectives, the Article seeks to enrich the ongoing discussion on how celebrities, the legal system, and society navigate this complex and ever-evolving interplay.

I. Benefits of Celebrity Cases

Celebrity cases, while often sensationalized by the media, can offer several benefits to the legal system and society at large.

One crucial benefit lies in their potential to raise public awareness about intricate legal issues. Complex legal concepts, often confined to legal textbooks and inaccessible to the general public, can become more readily understood through the lens of celebrity involvement. High-profile cases can spark crucial conversations about social justice, legal reform, and the importance of upholding the rule of law. For instance, the #MeToo movement, ignited by allegations of sexual misconduct against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein in 2017, brought widespread attention to issues of sexual harassment and assault within powerful industries. The subsequent legal cases, though not involving celebrities exclusively, shed light on the prevalence of such issues and the need for systemic changes to ensure fair and transparent legal proceedings for victims (Bartollas, C., & DeKeseredy, V., 2013).

Furthermore, celebrity cases can serve as a powerful deterrent to criminal activity. When celebrities face consequences for their actions, it can send a strong message to the public, particularly those who idolize them. This potential for influencing behavior underscores the importance of holding everyone accountable, regardless of their fame or social status. The conviction of musician Phil Spector for the murder of actress Lana Clarkson in 2003 sent a strong message that even celebrities are not above the law and that violence against women will not be tolerated, potentially deterring similar acts and fostering public awareness about the seriousness of gun violence (Douglas, J. E., & Olshaker, M., 2017).

Finally, the intense public scrutiny surrounding celebrity cases can act as a catalyst for transparency within the legal system. Public pressure can expose potential biases and injustices, prompting calls for accountability and reform within legal institutions. The ongoing legal battles surrounding Edward Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who leaked classified information revealing government surveillance programs, have sparked global discussions about privacy rights, national security, and the role of whistleblowers in exposing government wrongdoing (Greenwald, L., 2013).

II. Drawbacks of Celebrity Cases

Despite the potential benefits, celebrity cases also present several drawbacks that warrant careful consideration. One major concern involves media sensationalism. The media's portrayal of celebrity cases often prioritizes sensationalism over substantive legal analysis. The focus on drama, spectacle, and personal details can overshadow the intricacies of legal proceedings, leading to public misinformation and hindering a nuanced understanding of the legal process. For instance, the trial of Casey Anthony (2011), accused of murdering her daughter, was heavily sensationalized by the media, with extensive coverage focusing on her personal life and courtroom behavior rather than the legal arguments and evidence presented. This sensationalized portrayal hindered public understanding of the complexities of the case and the legal process, potentially influencing public opinion and juror selection (Yarbro, S. L., & Miller, M. K., 2012).

Another significant drawback concerns unequal treatment. Concerns regarding preferential treatment for celebrities within the legal system persist. The perception of leniency or expedited processes can erode public trust in the justice system and raise questions about the application of the law being impartial and consistent. For instance, the case of Paris Hilton (2007), sentenced to jail time for violating probation terms related to a DUI charge, sparked debates about whether celebrities receive harsher or more lenient treatment compared to non-celebrities for similar offenses. This highlights the need for consistent application of the law, regardless of an individual's social status, and ongoing efforts to address potential biases within the legal system (Jewkes, Y., 2011).

Finally, privacy concerns remain a significant challenge in celebrity cases. The relentless media coverage surrounding celebrity legal entanglements can infringe upon their right to privacy. The exposure of personal details, often irrelevant to the legal proceedings, can have lasting repercussions on their lives and well-being. For instance, the highly publicized divorce proceedings of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt in 2016 involved extensive media coverage of their personal lives and child custody arrangements, raising concerns about the potential violation of their privacy and the impact on their children (Associated Press, 2016).

III. Case Studies: A Multifaceted Exploration

1. O.J. Simpson Murder Trial (1995): This landmark case, involving former football star O.J. Simpson accused of murdering his ex-wife and her friend, serves as a prime example of the multifaceted impact of celebrity cases on the legal system and broader society.

a) Legal Analysis:

- Pre-trial publicity: The extensive media coverage, often sensationalized and racially charged, raised concerns about potential juror bias and the ability to ensure a fair trial. This case led to discussions about:
- Jury sequestration: Isolating jurors from external influences during trials to minimize media exposure and potential bias (Turner, C. E., & Rachlinski, J. J., 2016).
- Changes in the juror selection process: Implementing stricter guidelines to ensure diverse and representative jury pools that can fairly evaluate evidence without prejudice (American Bar Association, 2023).
- Evidentiary issues: The handling of DNA evidence, a relatively new technology at the time, was heavily scrutinized, raising questions about proper collection, chain of custody, and interpretation. This case contributed to:
- Advancements in forensic science: Emphasizing the importance of meticulous evidence collection, preservation, and analysis techniques to ensure admissibility and reliability in court (National Institute of Justice, 2023).
- Increased scrutiny of forensic evidence: Highlighting the need for robust procedures and expert testimony to establish the validity and interpretation of forensic evidence (Cole, S. A., 2001).
- Defense strategies: The "race card" defense tactic employed by Simpson's lawyers sparked debates about its ethical implications and potential to divert attention from the facts of the case. This case ignited discussions about:
- Implicit bias in the legal system: Recognizing the potential for unconscious biases to influence legal proceedings and advocating for strategies to mitigate their impact (Krieger, L. J., & Fiske, A. P., 2006).
- Ethical considerations in legal defense: Balancing the right to a vigorous defense with upholding ethical standards and avoiding tactics that exploit societal biases (American Bar Association, 2023).

b) Impact:

- Public discourse on race and justice: The trial sparked national conversations about race relations, police brutality, and the fairness of the criminal justice system, particularly for minorities (Ogletree, C. C., & Ogletree, C., 2016).
- Scrutiny of media coverage: The case highlighted the potential for media sensationalism to influence public opinion and potentially prejudice jurors, prompting discussions about responsible media reporting during high-profile trials (Johnson, T. J., 2005).
- Shifting public perceptions of celebrities: The Simpson case challenged the notion of celebrities as untouchable figures and demonstrated that they are accountable to the law like any other citizen (Turner, G., 2004).

c) Legislation and Precedents:

- California Civil Rights Initiative (Proposition 16, 1996):
- Purpose: Prohibited affirmative action programs in state government hiring, contracting, and education.
- Context: Passed in the wake of the O.J. Simpson verdict, where some perceived the jury's acquittal as influenced by racial bias. Proponents argued that affirmative action programs unfairly discriminated against non-minority individuals.
- Impact: Sparked nationwide debate about affirmative action and its role in addressing racial inequalities.
- Legal Status: Overturned by California voters in November 2020, allowing affirmative action programs to resume in the state.
- Other Relevant Precedents:
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978): The Supreme Court upheld the use of affirmative action in admissions decisions but struck down quotas based solely on race.
- Fisher v. University of Texas (2016): The Supreme Court upheld the use of affirmative action in admissions decisions but required universities to demonstrate that their programs are narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest.

2. Bill Cosby Sexual Assault Cases (2005-2018):

This series of allegations against comedian Bill Cosby of sexual assault against multiple women over several decades ignited discussions about:

a) Legal Analysis:

- Statute of limitations issues: Many of the alleged assaults occurred decades prior, raising challenges in pursuing legal action due to time constraints. This case contributed to:
- Debates about reforming statutes of limitations in sexual assault cases, particularly for historical cases where evidence may be weaker or victims may have delayed reporting due to fear or societal stigma (Estrich, S., 1987).
- Increased focus on investigative techniques for handling historical sexual assault cases, emphasizing the importance of preserving evidence and encouraging timely reporting (Lisak, D. A., 2014).
- Evidentiary considerations: The reliance on witness testimonies and the absence of physical evidence in some cases presented difficulties in establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This case highlighted the:
- Challenges of prosecuting historical sexual assault cases where physical evidence may be scarce or degraded over time (Lisak, D. A., 2014).
- Importance of corroborating evidence and witness testimony to strengthen the prosecution's case in situations with limited physical evidence (Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 404(b), 28 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.).
- Power dynamics and victim credibility: The societal power imbalance between Cosby and his accusers, along with challenges in addressing issues of victim blaming, added further layers of complexity. The case brought attention to:
- The need for improved training for law enforcement and judicial personnel on handling sexual assault cases with sensitivity and avoiding victim-blaming narratives (Campbell, R., & Raja, S., 2018).
- Efforts to address societal biases often discredit victims of sexual assault, particularly when facing powerful individuals (Davies, J., 2014).

b) Impact:

- #MeToo movement: The Cosby case is considered a catalyst for the #MeToo movement, empowering victims of sexual assault to come forward and speak out against perpetrators, regardless of their social status (Freedman, P. A., 2018).
- Increased awareness of sexual assault: The case brought renewed attention to the prevalence of sexual assault and the challenges faced by victims, particularly in seeking justice (Matthews, H., 2016).
- Legislative reforms: The movement sparked legislative reforms in various jurisdictions, including expanding the scope of sexual assault definitions, extending statutes of limitations, and improving support services for victims (Stuhlman, L., 2018).

c) Legislation and Precedents:

The Cosby case itself did not set a specific legal precedent as the conviction was later overturned on procedural grounds. However, the broader impact of the #MeToo movement has influenced legislative changes and ongoing discussions about reforming legal frameworks to better address sexual assault (Slaughter, A-M., 2018).

IV. New Trends and Emerging Challenges:

The landscape of celebrity cases is constantly evolving, with new trends and challenges emerging in the digital age. Here are some noteworthy developments:

- Rise of social media: The pervasive influence of social media platforms presents unique challenges for legal proceedings, including:
- Potential juror exposure to biased narratives and online harassment of parties involved raises concerns about influencing the fairness of trials.
- The spread of misinformation and the potential to prejudice public opinion, necessitate efforts to combat online disinformation and promote media literacy (Shearer, D., & Nielsen, R. A., 2016).
- Blurring lines between public and private lives: The increasing accessibility of celebrities' personal lives through social media and reality TV can create a sense of entitlement and scrutiny that can influence their legal cases. This highlights the need to:
- Balance the public's right to information with the right to privacy, particularly for individuals not directly involved in legal proceedings (European Convention on Human Rights, Article 8).
- Establish ethical guidelines for media coverage and public discourse surrounding celebrity legal matters to protect individual privacy and uphold fair legal processes (Society of Professional Journalists, Code of Ethics, 2023).
- The global reach of legal issues: With the interconnectedness of the world, celebrity cases can have a global reach, impacting public opinion and legal frameworks across different jurisdictions. This necessitates:

International cooperation among legal systems to ensure fair and consistent application of the law in cases involving individuals from different countries (International Cooperation Center for Criminal Justice, n.d.).

V. Harmonizing Legal Approaches to Address Emerging Challenges in the Digital Age

The ubiquitous presence of the internet has revolutionized our lives, offering unprecedented opportunities for communication, information sharing, and social connection. However, this digital landscape also presents novel challenges, particularly regarding online harassment and the global reach of social media. These issues transcend national borders, necessitating a harmonized approach to developing effective legal frameworks across different jurisdictions.

- Challenges and Concerns:

- Online harassment: The anonymity and reach of the internet can embolden individuals to engage in online harassment, including cyberbullying, stalking, and hate speech. These acts can have severe psychological and emotional consequences for victims, often disproportionately impacting vulnerable groups.
- The global reach of social media: Social media platforms operate globally, making it challenging to hold them accountable for harmful content or enforce local laws due to jurisdictional complexities. This raises concerns about the potential for platforms to become safe havens for online abuse and the difficulty in ensuring consistent enforcement of regulations across different countries.

- The Need for Harmonization :

The fragmented nature of current legal frameworks poses significant obstacles in effectively addressing these challenges. A harmonized approach is crucial to:

- Establish consistent definitions and standards: Defining key terms like "online harassment" and "cyberbullying" in a consistent manner across different legal systems is essential for ensuring clear and enforceable regulations.
- Facilitate international cooperation: Harmonized legal frameworks can facilitate collaboration between law enforcement agencies across borders, enabling effective investigation and prosecution of online crimes regardless of the perpetrator's location.
- Promote accountability for social media platforms: Establishing consistent standards for content moderation and user accountability across different jurisdictions can incentivize platforms to implement robust safeguards against online abuse and harmful content.
- Existing Efforts and the Path Forward:

Several initiatives are already underway to address these challenges, including:

- The Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime (2001): This treaty, ratified by 67 countries, establishes a framework for international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cybercrime, including online harassment.
- The G7 Lyon Declaration on the Fight Against Child Sexual Abuse Online (2021): This declaration outlines commitments from G7 member states to enhance cooperation in tackling online child sexual abuse content.

While these initiatives represent a positive step forward, further efforts are needed to achieve effective harmonization:

- Developing comprehensive legal frameworks: Countries should continue to develop and refine their national laws addressing online harassment and social media regulation, drawing upon international instruments and best practices.
- Fostering international dialogue and cooperation: Regular communication and collaboration among policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and civil society organizations across different jurisdictions are crucial to sharing best practices and addressing emerging challenges collectively.
- Engaging with stakeholders: Meaningful engagement with social media platforms, technology companies, and civil society organizations is essential to develop effective solutions that address the root causes of online abuse and promote responsible online behavior.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complexities

Celebrity cases present a complex legal and social phenomenon that requires a multifaceted approach and ongoing thoughtful discourse. While presenting challenges associated with media sensationalism, potential unequal treatment, and privacy concerns, these cases also offer opportunities to:

- Address Critical Legal and Social Issues: The high-profile nature of celebrity cases can thrust critical legal and social issues, often previously residing in the shadows, into the public spotlight. This creates a platform for wider societal analysis and can potentially lead to positive changes through increased awareness and calls for reform.
- Spark Constructive Dialogues on Fairness and Accountability: Public discourse surrounding celebrity cases, when conducted responsibly and fostered effectively, can ignite discussions about the very fundamental tenets of fairness and justice within the legal system. These dialogues can explore the concept of equal treatment under the law, the potential power imbalances involved, and the need for ongoing evaluation of legal frameworks to ensure their fair and impartial application.
- Empower Individuals and Promote Accountability: Through increased awareness and public scrutiny associated with celebrity cases, individuals may be empowered to seek legal recourse, holding individuals in positions of power accountable for their actions. This potential serves as a powerful testament to the legal system's ability to uphold the rule of law, regardless of social status or influence.

Navigating the complexities of celebrity cases effectively necessitates a multi-pronged approach rooted in the following crucial points:

- Upholding a Fair and Impartial Legal System : The cornerstone of addressing these complexities lies in maintaining a legal system that prioritizes absolute fairness and impartiality. This entails rigorous safeguards against bias and prejudice within the system, ensuring equal treatment for all individuals regardless of fame or social standing. Additionally, pursuing truth and justice must supersede any temptations towards sensationalism during legal proceedings.
- Ensuring Responsible Media Coverage : Media outlets bear a significant responsibility to uphold ethical reporting standards when covering celebrity cases. This necessitates providing accurate, objective, and unbiased information while avoiding sensationalized narratives and respecting the privacy rights of individuals involved. Journalists must commit to the core principles of truthfulness and fairness, ensuring responsible and informative representations of legal proceedings.
- Fostering Media Literacy and Critical Thinking : Empowering the public with media literacy and critical thinking skills is crucial in navigating the complexities of not only celebrity cases but also broader information consumption in the digital age. By facilitating the ability to critically evaluate information, identify potential biases, and differentiate between fact and opinion, the public can engage in more informed and constructive dialogues.
- Engaging in Open and Constructive Dialogue : Addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by celebrity cases demands continuous and open dialogue involving legal professionals, media representatives, the public, and policymakers. This collaborative discussion fosters a collective commitment to upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and respect for individual rights, ultimately leading to positive policy shifts and responsible journalistic practices.
- Adapting and Refining Legal Frameworks : The legal system must retain its ability to adapt and respond to the continuously evolving landscape of society and technology. This necessitates ongoing evaluation of legal frameworks, allowing for appropriate reforms to effectively address the unique challenges presented by celebrity cases in the digital age. By prioritizing continuous modernization, the legal system can ensure its capacity to safeguard fundamental principles of justice and equality for all citizens.

Through ongoing collaboration, responsible media practices, and an unwavering commitment to upholding the principles of justice, we can transform the complexities associated with celebrity cases into driving forces for positive societal change and a more equitable legal system. This multifaceted approach fosters informed discourse, promotes responsible media representation, and ultimately serves as a testament to the fundamental tenets of a fair and just legal system.

References

- American Bar Association. (2023). Model Rules of Professional Conduct. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/
- American Bar Association. (2023). Standards for Criminal Justice. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/
- Associated Press. (2016, September 20). Angelina Jolie files for divorce from Brad Pitt. https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/hollywood/i-had-taken-things-as-far-as-when-brad-pitt-confessed-using-alcohol-to-cope-after-angelina-jolie-divorce-1250767
- Bartollas, C., & DeKeseredy, V. (2013). Gender and crime: A justice perspective. Routledge.
- Bobo, K., & Thompson, V. L. (2000). Racism in the U.S.). Prentice Hall.
- Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (2018). The injury of victim blaming in interpersonal violence. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 187-196.
- Cole, S. A. (2001). Mistakes and misleading testimony in forensic science. Jurimetrics, 41(4), 471-485.
- Council of Europe. (2001, November 23). Convention on Cybercrime.
- Davies, J. (2014). Intimate betrayals: Recognizing and responding to the trauma of sexual violence. Routledge.
- Douglas, J. E., & Olshaker, M. (2017). Phil Spector: The death of innocence. John Wiley & Sons.
- Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.
- European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
- Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 404(b), 28 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
- Freedman, P. A. (2018). Unbound: The story of the #MeToo movement. HarperCollins.
- Greenwald, L. (2013). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state. Bodley Head.
- International Cooperation Center for Criminal Justice. (n.d.).
- Jewkes, Y. (2011). Media, crime, and culture: An introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Jewkes, Y. (2011). Media portrayals of crime and victimization. Routledge.
- Johnson, T. J. (2005). Reel justice: The cultural logic of courtroom dramas. NYU Press.
- Johnson, T. J. (2005). The trial: O.J. Simpson, race, and media. Northeastern University Press.
- Krieger, L. J., & Fiske, A. P. (2006). Stereotype susceptibility: What can we learn about its operation from social cognition and social psychology? Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 398.
- Lisak, D. A. (2014). Rethinking rape law. Columbia University Press.
- Matthews, H. (2016). Why don't they report? The silenced majority and the problem of sexual assault. NYU Press.
- National Institute of Justice. (2023, January 11). Forensic Science.
- Ogletree, C. C., & Ogletree, C. (2016). The O.J. Simpson case and American justice. Simon and Schuster.
- Shearer, D., & Nielsen, R. A. (2016). Twitter and the flow of information during crisis events. Communication Research, 43(2), 190-207.
- Slaughter, A-M. (2018). Choice: A reckoning on birth, abortion, and women's lives. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
- Society of Professional Journalists. (2023). Code of Ethics.
- Stuntz, W. J. (2011). Peculiar justice: America's troubled relationship with differences. Harvard University Press.
- Stuhlman, L. (2018). The #MeToo movement: A new wave of feminism. University of North Carolina Press.
- Turner, C. E., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2016). Juror decision-making. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12(1), 321-344.
- Turner, C. E., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2016). Juror sequestration in high-profile criminal cases: Examining the evidence on its effectiveness and constitutionality. Law & Innovation, 10(1), 37-62.
- Turner, G. (2004). Celebrating celebrity. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Yarbro, S. L., & Miller, M. K. (2012). Media coverage and public opinion in the Casey Anthony trial: A content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(3), 632-653.

Additional Resources:

- The National Conference of State Legislatures: Affirmative Action https://www.ncsl.org/
- The Brennan Center for Justice: Affirmative Action https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/education-and-incarceration-beyond-affirmative-action

[...]

Ende der Leseprobe aus 13 Seiten - nach oben

Details

Titel: From Sensationalism to Reform. A Critical Analysis of Celebrity Cases and their Influence on the Legal System
Autor: Ahmad Swaiss (Autor:in)
Erscheinungsjahr: 2024
Seiten: 13
Katalognummer: V1452294
ISBN (PDF): 9783963559754
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagworte: Celebrity cases O.J. Simpson Murder Trial Bill Cosby Sexual Assault Cases Trends Social Media Criminal Law Law

Arbeit zitieren: Ahmad Swaiss (Autor:in), 2024, From Sensationalism to Reform. A Critical Analysis of Celebrity Cases and their Influence on the Legal System, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1452294

From Sensationalism to Reform. A Critical Analysis of Celebrity Cases and their Influence on the Legal System