In this essay, I intend to analyse Eriksen’s (2002) assertion that ethnicity is an aspect of a relationship, rather than a property of a group (2002:12), and do so in light of other relevant theories and issues in order to provide a critical discussion of the concept as a whole.
Since its introduction into the spectrum of anthropological discussion, the notion of ethnicity has been received with considerable debate and postulation. At a general level, however, it has been examined as an element closely related to, or even governing, broader areas such as cultural identity, nationalism, as well as individual and group identification.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- Case Study: Mitchell's The Kalela Dance
- The Concept of Ethnicity
- Further Insights into Ethnicity
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This essay critically examines Eriksen's assertion that ethnicity is a relationship, rather than a property of a group. It analyzes the concept of ethnicity through various theoretical frameworks and case studies, aiming to provide a comprehensive discussion of its complexities and nuances.
- The relational nature of ethnicity
- The role of cultural difference and contact in shaping ethnic identities
- The importance of symbolic elements in defining ethnicity
- The influence of historical and social contexts on ethnicity
- The subjectivity and diversity of ethnic expressions
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The essay begins by introducing Mitchell's ethnography of the Kalela Dance, which focuses on the Bisa tribe in Northern Rhodesia. The study highlights the emergence of the dance as a response to colonial influence and the interplay of ethnic diversity and cultural contact.
The essay then delves into the concept of ethnicity, exploring Eriksen's anti-essentialist approach and examining key criteria for its existence, such as cultural difference and contact.
The final section explores further insights into ethnicity, drawing on the work of Schermerhorn and Nash to discuss the role of symbolic elements in defining group identity.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Ethnicity, cultural identity, relational perspective, anti-essentialism, symbolic elements, cultural difference, contact, colonialism, case studies, The Kalela Dance, Bisa tribe, Northern Rhodesia.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ethnicity a property of a group or a relationship?
According to Eriksen (2002), ethnicity is primarily an aspect of a relationship between groups rather than an inherent property of a single group.
What role does cultural contact play in defining ethnicity?
Ethnicity emerges when groups come into contact and perceive cultural differences, making it a relational and situational phenomenon.
What is "The Kalela Dance" study about?
Mitchell's case study of the Bisa tribe shows how a traditional-style dance became a symbol of ethnic identity and a response to colonial urban environments.
How do symbolic elements influence ethnic identity?
Symbols, as discussed by scholars like Nash, serve as markers that define boundaries and maintain group identification over time.
What is the anti-essentialist approach to ethnicity?
It argues that ethnic identities are not fixed or biological but are socially constructed and fluid depending on historical and social contexts.
- Quote paper
- Timothy McGlinchey (Author), 2015, Ethnicity. Aspect of a Relationship or Property of a Group?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/322773
