Effective monitoring structure within a company is one major concern of corporate govern-ance. Both China and Germany adopt a two-tier board structure and have experienced similar considerable difficulties regarding the efficacy of the supervisory boards. This paper focuses on the different ways in which both countries addressed this problem. It is argued that there has been no need for China to adopt a parallel system of independent directors. Rather, China should have followed the German way and professionalized its supervisory boards.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Abstract
- I. Introduction
- II. Internal governance structure of companies
- 1. Germany
- 2. China
- III. Supervisory concerns and reforms
- 1. Germany
- 2. China
- IV. Comparison and assessment
- 1. The notion of independent director
- 2. The role of the supervisory board
- 3. The role of the management board
- 4. The role of the shareholders
- 5. The role of the state
- 6. Cultural obstacles
- V. Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This research essay explores the effectiveness of corporate governance in companies with a dual board structure, focusing on the experiences of China and Germany. The essay aims to understand how both countries have addressed challenges related to the efficiency of supervisory boards and to assess the effectiveness of different reform approaches.- Comparison of corporate governance structures in China and Germany
- Analysis of the role of supervisory boards in both countries
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of different reforms
- Exploration of the impact of cultural factors on corporate governance
- Discussion of the potential benefits and drawbacks of independent directors
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- I. Introduction: This chapter introduces the concept of corporate governance and the focus of the essay on the control aspect in China and Germany. It highlights the challenges both countries have faced with the two-tier board system and the contrasting reform approaches.
- II. Internal governance structure of companies: This chapter delves into the internal governance structures of companies in Germany and China. It examines the different types of companies, the roles of their respective bodies (management board, supervisory board, and shareholders' meeting), and the powers vested in each body.
- III. Supervisory concerns and reforms: This chapter explores the concerns that arose regarding the effectiveness of supervisory boards in both Germany and China. It details the reforms implemented in each country, including the expansion of the supervisory board's duties and rights in Germany and the efforts to address the issue of concentrated ownership and insider control in China.
- IV. Comparison and assessment: This chapter compares and assesses the different approaches taken by Germany and China to improve corporate governance. It examines the concept of independent directors, the role of the supervisory board, the management board, shareholders, the state, and the influence of cultural factors on corporate governance practices.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
This research essay focuses on corporate governance, dual board structure, supervisory boards, management boards, shareholders, state, China, Germany, independent directors, reforms, cultural obstacles, and comparative analysis.Frequently Asked Questions
What is a dual board structure in corporate governance?
A dual or two-tier board structure consists of two separate bodies: a management board responsible for daily operations and a supervisory board that monitors and advises the management.
How does the German supervisory board differ from the Chinese one?
Germany has a long tradition of professionalized supervisory boards with specific rights and duties, while China has faced challenges with "insider control" and concentrated state ownership affecting board efficacy.
Why did China introduce independent directors?
China introduced independent directors to improve oversight and protect minority shareholders, following an Anglo-American model, though this often created a "parallel system" alongside the supervisory board.
What are the main cultural obstacles to corporate governance in China?
Obstacles include a traditional respect for hierarchy and the strong influence of the state, which can sometimes hinder the independent critical function of supervisory bodies.
Should China follow the German model of professionalization?
The author argues that instead of a parallel system of independent directors, China should focus on professionalizing and empowering its existing supervisory boards, similar to the German approach.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Dr. Alexander Shchavelev (Autor:in), 2012, Improving Corporate Governance in Companies with a Dual Board Structure, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/262676
