In this paper I am going to describe the fall of conventional political participation within
western European countries. Later on I am going to defend some possible ways to fix it and
finally, I will expose my proposal: promotion of direct democracy through the Participatory
Budgeting. With the cases of Porto Alegre and Seville, -with different situations and
challenges- the values of transparency, participation, deliberation and responsiveness
become especially protagonist. Politicians often think that people do not have any interest for
the political arena. In fact, rarely they make decisions to try to attract citizens to institutions.
Like the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, they blame external
factors to explain why citizenship refuses in part their representatives 1. The separation
between citizen's demands and politician's rules could be a possible answer to the tragic riots
during last weeks in England. Similarly, the reason for the Spanish Revolution that “pushed”
during May and June millions of citizens of varied social groups into the streets is not only the
tremendous unemployment rate. We cannot understand any social behavior if we exclude the
political variable. Both David Cameron as Zapatero have decided strong economic cuts -
hard to understand for citizens - while the voice of millions of Europeans against these
decisions were expressed roundly. The sensation of politicians deaf respect citizens and the
increasing idea that they do not solve anything is frequent.
At the same time, social movements, demonstrations and claims thrive, creating a
democracy with varied and multiple channels where ideas are expressed. Citizens are
interested in politics, but the current representative system is marked by slowness and rigidity
of the new times. Literature shows us how voter turnout and affiliations to political parties drop
dramatically until today, with alarming rates of disaffection, skepticism and distrust to political
institutions. People do not find solutions and support from parties, and the divorce is a fact.
However, our societies are mature and prepared for more protagonism in decision-making.
We should decide more times than once every four years. We want and we need. We have to
walk to a new model of democracy. Then, how are the principal Participatory Budgeting's
experiences? What can we learn from them?
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. From a representative and distant democracy to a broad, plural and skeptical political arena
3. The Participatory Budgeting experience, a short outlook
3.1 Porto Alegre: pioneer and model to follow
3.2 Seville: challenge and reference in Europe
4. What can we learn from these experiences?
5. Conclusions
Bibliography
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X.