The decision to abort a child brings the prospective mother/parents always into a morally and ethically conflict. Anneli Kero conducted a case study examining this assumption in 2002.
My task for the present paper was to create an own research design with a different focus in the range of the same topic. I chose the questionning if the decision-making process of aborting a child would be different if the soon-to-be child would be handicapped. The aim of the research design was to find out if the inhibition treshold of the abortion of a handicapped child would be lower than with a physically healthy child.
My second task within this paper was to relate the research design to Poppers falsification principle and Chalmers´ thoughts about science in general.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: The Research Design
1.1 A case study
1.2 Introducing the problem
1.3 How to find an answer- the research design
Chapter 2: Answering The Questions
2.1 In which ways has your reserach design been influenced by Chalmers and/or Popper?
2.2 Discuss criticaly what characterizes your own
discipline/subject concerning theories and methods
2.3 When and during which conditions is it possible to start a scientific revolution?
“Objective reality”- what for?
Sources
Appendix
-
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X. -
Upload your own papers! Earn money and win an iPhone X.