How useful are avoidance/ mitigation of incidents agreements such as the Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES)?

Utility Assessment of CUES for Maritime Safety and Maritime Security


Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 2022

20 Pages, Grade: A


Abstract or Introduction

How useful are avoidance/mitigation of incidents agreements such as the Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES) in reducing the risks of conflict and building confidence in the Indo-Pacific waters?

The Indo-Pacific waters and, therein, the South China Sea (SCS) qualifies as the “center of gravity in global geopolitics”. Foremost due to its attributes as a disputed area of sovereignty/dominion, its rich flow/stock resources, and crucial sealines of communication for world trade. To peacefully manage SCS’s MARSAF and MARSEC , the literature suggests that over the past political/military leaders have built a profound framework of “Maritime Confidence-building Measures” (MCBM) to improve “awareness” and “governance” on a “strategic, operational and tactical” level. In particular, through the collaborative “security communities” concept (e.g., ASEAN, ADMM, ADMM Plus, WPNS, MMCA) and “legally binding and nonbinding instruments” (e.g., COLREG, UNCLOS, CUES).

In contrast, from 2010 to 2020, increased hegemonic Chinese military and grey zone activities as well as Vietnamese/Indonesian/Philippine/Thai (re)actions led to 73 deliberate ship rammings/ chasings/harassings among the parties. Between 2016 and 2018, China conducted 18 risky close-distance maneuvers toward U.S. naval vessels in the Pacific.
These numbers suggest a practical discrepancy, “compliance” shortfall, and “unsafe” behavior by the signatories (in particular by China), raising initial doubts about the utility of the MCBM framework to achieve its safety/security purposes.
To scope the essay to a workable set of SCS related research questions, it will examine to which extent the nonbinding CUES ('Independent Variable') did/will prove useful:
a) to increase MARSAF ('Antecedent Condition' on tactical and operational levels),
b) to (then) increase MARSEC ('Dependent Variable' on a strategic level)?

Details

Title
How useful are avoidance/ mitigation of incidents agreements such as the Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES)?
Subtitle
Utility Assessment of CUES for Maritime Safety and Maritime Security
College
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies,Nanyang Technological University  (SAF-NTU Academy)
Course
Maritime Security Studies
Grade
A
Author
Year
2022
Pages
20
Catalog Number
V1291683
ISBN (eBook)
9783346755230
ISBN (Book)
9783346755247
Language
English
Notes
I thought this essay is very interesting, as it tackles the efficacy of CUES from two different, parallel lenses - one revolving around maritime safety and the other around maritime security. [...] the question is whether MARSAF and MARSEC are necessarily unlinked, and if otherwise, under what conditions? [...] I thought for such a thoughtful essay that has displayed evidently significant amount of thinking and research behind this product, these questions might spur the author to think about further expanding this paper.
Keywords
Maritime Security, Maritime Safety, Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea
Quote paper
Dr. phil. Mathias Jahn (Author), 2022, How useful are avoidance/ mitigation of incidents agreements such as the Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES)?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1291683

Comments

  • No comments yet.
Look inside the ebook
Title: How useful are avoidance/ mitigation of incidents agreements such as the Code of Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES)?



Upload papers

Your term paper / thesis:

- Publication as eBook and book
- High royalties for the sales
- Completely free - with ISBN
- It only takes five minutes
- Every paper finds readers

Publish now - it's free