Grin logo
en de es fr
Boutique
GRIN Website
Publier des textes, profitez du service complet
Aller à la page d’accueil de la boutique › Philosophie - Philosophie d'époque moderne (env. 1350-1600)

The depiction of violence and justification in Machiavelli's "The Prince". A brief overview

Titre: The depiction of violence and justification in Machiavelli's "The Prince". A brief overview

Essai , 2020 , 6 Pages , Note: First Class Honours

Autor:in: Tim Windbrake (Auteur)

Philosophie - Philosophie d'époque moderne (env. 1350-1600)
Extrait & Résumé des informations   Lire l'ebook
Résumé Extrait Résumé des informations

This essay argues that Machiavelli’s depiction and justification of violence in 'The Prince' follows from a consequentialist view in which violence can and should be used by a prince in order to provide order and stability to the people if necessary. Machiavelli is not trying to argue whether the act of violence itself is ethically right or wrong. His aim in 'The Prince' is to assess the effectiveness of actions that serve the prince’s goals, namely, order and stability for himself and the people, where violence and cruelty are normal political tools a prince can and should use for his advantage.

Extrait


Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)

  • Depicting the strategic use of violence
  • The consequentialist justification of violence
  • Assessing the consequentialist justification
  • Conclusion

Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)

This essay examines Machiavelli's portrayal and justification of violence in "The Prince," arguing that his approach stems from a consequentialist perspective. Machiavelli emphasizes the use of violence by a prince to ensure order and stability for the people, even if such actions are morally ambiguous. He emphasizes the effectiveness of actions in achieving these goals, rather than their intrinsic morality.

  • The strategic use of violence by a prince
  • The consequentialist justification of violence
  • The significance of the prince's true ends
  • The role of security and stability for the people
  • The justification of violence in a consequentialist framework

Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)

  • Depicting the strategic use of violence: This section explores how Machiavelli portrays the strategic use of violence, using the example of Ramiro d'Orca, who was executed for his brutality, and the concept of "crushing" enemies to prevent revenge. It suggests that Machiavelli prioritizes order and stability over ethical considerations.
  • The consequentialist justification of violence: This section explains Machiavelli's consequentialist view, arguing that actions are judged by their effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes, such as unity and stability. The prince's use of violence, even cruelty, is justified if it strengthens his power and ensures order.
  • Assessing the consequentialist justification: This section examines the ambiguity in "The Prince" concerning Machiavelli's ultimate goal. It discusses two interpretations: a self-serving, egocentric view and a view focused on providing order and stability for the people. The legitimacy of Machiavelli's justification of violence depends on the true end he seeks.

Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)

Key terms and concepts central to this work include violence, consequentialism, order, stability, Machiavellianism, “The Prince,” strategic use of violence, cruelty, effectiveness, prince, unity, security, and the prince's true ends.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Machiavelli's view on the use of violence?

Machiavelli views violence as a normal political tool that a prince can and should use strategically to ensure order and stability for himself and his subjects.

How does "consequentialism" relate to Machiavelli's "The Prince"?

Machiavelli’s approach is consequentialist because he judges actions not by their intrinsic morality, but by their effectiveness in achieving the ultimate goals of security and political stability.

Who was Ramiro d'Orca and why is he mentioned?

Ramiro d'Orca was an official executed by Cesare Borgia. Machiavelli uses this example to show how a prince can use a "scapegoat" to redirect the people's resentment after necessary but cruel actions.

Does Machiavelli think violence is ethically right?

He does not argue for the ethical rightness of violence; instead, he assesses the necessity of actions based on political realism and the results they produce for the state.

What are the "true ends" of a prince according to the essay?

The essay discusses two interpretations: a self-serving goal of maintaining power, and a more benevolent goal of providing a stable and secure environment for the population.

Fin de l'extrait de 6 pages  - haut de page

Résumé des informations

Titre
The depiction of violence and justification in Machiavelli's "The Prince". A brief overview
Université
London School of Economics
Note
First Class Honours
Auteur
Tim Windbrake (Auteur)
Année de publication
2020
Pages
6
N° de catalogue
V1128121
ISBN (ebook)
9783346491640
Langue
anglais
mots-clé
machiavelli prince
Sécurité des produits
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Citation du texte
Tim Windbrake (Auteur), 2020, The depiction of violence and justification in Machiavelli's "The Prince". A brief overview, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1128121
Lire l'ebook
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
  • Si vous voyez ce message, l'image n'a pas pu être chargée et affichée.
Extrait de  6  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Expédition
  • Mentions légales
  • Prot. des données
  • CGV
  • Imprint